Skip to main content

Table 2 Discriminant genera among treatments for pig gut microbiomes at d 21 and 42

From: Interactions between maternal parity and feed additives drive the composition of pig gut microbiomes in the post-weaning period

Time-point

Genus1

Treat-ment2

Indicator value

Average relative abundance for Con, %

Average relative abundance for Preb, %

Average relative abundance for Preb + ZnCu, %

P-value3

d 21

o__Clostridiales.f__Clostridiaceae.g__Clostridium

Con

0.54

\({0.42}^{a}\)

\({0.05}^{b}\)

\({0.26}^{a}\)

 < 0.05

d 21

o__Clostridiales.f__Clostridiaceae.g__

Con

0.53

\({4.32}^{a}\)

\({0.52}^{b}\)

\({3.33}^{a}\)

 < 0.05

d 21

o__Clostridiales.f__Clostridiaceae.g__SMB53

Con

0.51

\({1.26}^{a}\)

\({0.15}^{b}\)

\({1.04}^{a}\)

 < 0.05

d 21

o__Clostridiales.f__Veillonellaceae.g__Dialister

Preb

0.74

\({0.08}^{a}\)

\({0.95}^{b}\)

\({0.25}^{a}\)

 < 0.05

d 21

o__Pirellulales.f__Pirellulaceae.g__

Preb

0.69

\({0.09}^{a}\)

\({0.53}^{b}\)

\({0.01}^{a}\)

 < 0.05

d 21

o__Bacteroidales.f__p.2534.18B5.g__

Preb

0.66

\({0.04}^{a}\)

\({0.20}^{b}\)

\({0.03}^{a}\)

 < 0.05

d 21

o__Clostridiales.f__Veillonellaceae.g__Acidaminococcus

Preb

0.61

\({0.26}^{a}\)

\({1.27}^{b}\)

\({0.56}^{ab}\)

 < 0.05

d 21

o__Clostridiales.f__Veillonellaceae.g__Megasphaera

Preb

0.59

\({0.75}^{a}\)

\({4.47}^{b}\)

\({2.35}^{ab}\)

 < 0.05

d 21

p__Cyanobacteria.c__4C0d.2.o__YS2.f__.g__

Preb

0.59

\({0.38}^{ab}\)

\({0.96}^{a}\)

\({0.19}^{b}\)

 < 0.05

d 21

o__Clostridiales.f__Christensenellaceae.g__

Preb

0.58

\({0.79}^{a}\)

\({1.63}^{b}\)

\({0.42}^{a}\)

 < 0.05

d 21

o__Lactobacillales.f__Lactobacillaceae.g__Lactobacillus

Preb

0.57

\({3.11}^{a}\)

\({11.0}^{b}\)

\({5.04}^{a}\)

 < 0.05

d 21

o__Clostridiales.f__Lachnospiraceae.g__Oribacterium

Preb

0.55

\({0.13}^{a}\)

\({0.40}^{b}\)

\({0.20}^{a}\)

 < 0.05

d 21

o__Clostridiales.f__Veillonellaceae.__

Preb

0.55

\({0.06}^{a}\)

\({0.74}^{b}\)

\({0.30}^{a}\)

 < 0.05

d 21

o__Clostridiales.f__Veillonellaceae.g__Mitsuokella

Preb

0.53

\({0.42}^{a}\)

\({1.37}^{b}\)

\({0.81}^{ab}\)

 < 0.05

d 42

o__Clostridiales.f__Clostridiaceae.g__SMB53

Con

0.46

\({1.24}^{a}\)

\({0.64}^{b}\)

\({0.82}^{ab}\)

0.07

d 42

o__Erysipelotrichales.f__Erysipelotrichaceae.g__p.75.a5

Preb + ZnCu

0.45

\({0.04}^{a}\)

\({0.08}^{ab}\)

\({0.15}^{b}\)

0.09

  1. 1Listed taxa were selected on the basis of having indicator value scores of at least 0.4, and significant differences in average relative abundances between parity groups. Taxa are sorted by treatment group and then by indicator value. Listed taxa are identified to the genus (g) level, or represent unidentified genera within the listed family (f), order (o), class (c), or phylum (p), where applicable
  2. 2Treatment designations represent the dietary treatment group the listed taxa is enriched in
  3. 3P-values represent Kruskal Wallis tests among treatment groups
  4. a,bDiffering letter superscripts denote significant differences among groups (P < 0.05)