Skip to main content

Table 9 Effects of dietary Fe on protein levels of liver Fe-containing enzymes of broilers on d 21

From: The chemical characteristics of different sodium iron ethylenediaminetetraacetate sources and their relative bioavailabilities for broilers fed with a conventional corn-soybean meal diet

Fe source

Added Fe, mg/kg

CAT4, RQ

SDH4, RQ

COX4, RQ

Control1

0

0.85

0.91

0.76*

FeSO4∙7H2O1

20

0.88

0.91

0.82

40

0.96

0.90

0.92

60

0.98

0.88

0.94

Fe-Prot ES1

20

0.83

0.84

0.93

40

1.08

0.91

1.01

60

0.83

0.77

0.92

Feed grade NaFeEDTA1

20

0.98

0.91

0.95

40

0.94

0.93

0.86

60

0.90

1.02

0.90

Food grade

NaFeEDTA1

20

0.89

1.08

1.03

40

0.91

0.99

1.02

60

0.83

0.94

0.93

Pooled SE

 

0.12

0.09

0.08

Fe source2

FeSO4∙7H2O

0.94

0.90

0.90

Fe-Prot ES

0.91

0.84

0.95

Feed grade NaFeEDTA

0.94

0.95

0.88

Food grade NaFeEDTA

0.88

1.00

0.99

Pooled SE

 

0.07

0.05

0.05

Added Fe level3, mg/kg

20

0.90

0.93

0.93

40

0.97

0.93

0.95

60

0.89

0.90

0.90

Pooled SE

 

0.06

0.05

0.04

P-value

Fe source

0.9043

0.1428

0.3103

Added Fe level

0.5165

0.8610

0.6673

Fe Source × added Fe level

0.8383

0.7942

0.7392

  1. CAT Catalase, SDH Succinate dehydrogenase, COX Cytochrome c oxidase
  2. 1Data represent the means of 7 replicate cages (n = 7)
  3. 2Data represent the means of 21 replicate cages (n = 21)
  4. 3Data represent the means of 28 replicate cages (n = 28)
  5. 4The protein expression levels were calculated as the relative quantities (RQ) of the target gene protein to the GAPDH protein
  6. *Different (P < 0.05) from all Fe supplemental groups