Skip to main content

Table 6 Effects of dietary Fe on Fe contents in tissues of broilers on d 21

From: The chemical characteristics of different sodium iron ethylenediaminetetraacetate sources and their relative bioavailabilities for broilers fed with a conventional corn-soybean meal diet

Fe source

Added Fe, mg/kg

Heart Fe, μg/g (fresh basis)

Kidney Fe, μg/g

(fresh basis)

Liver Fe, μg/g

(fresh basis)

Tibia ash Fe, μg/g

(ash basis)

Control1

0

32.6

28.0*

75.3*

243

FeSO4∙7H2O1

20

30.6

39.1

97.7

252

40

33.2

47.3

101

240

60

35.7

48.8

102

247

Fe-Prot ES1

20

31.9

50.8

106

255

40

32.7

57.4

117

253

60

36.4

53.2

121

264

Feed grade NaFeEDTA1

20

36.9

42.6

105

260

40

35.6

53.0

123

246

60

35.3

50.9

133

258

Food grade

NaFeEDTA1

20

37.1

49.3

116

250

40

38.2

46.3

118

251

60

36.6

48.6

134

259

Pooled SE

 

1.58

3.67

8.06

7.24

Fe source2

FeSO4∙7H2O

33.2C

45.1

100B

246

Fe-Prot ES

34.1BC

53.8

115A

257

Feed grade NaFeEDTA

35.9AB

48.8

120A

255

Food grade NaFeEDTA

37.3A

48.1

122A

253

Pooled SE

 

0.91

2.06

4.78

4.36

Added Fe level3, mg/kg

20

34.1

45.5

106b

254

40

35.2

51.0

115ab

247

60

36.0

50.3

123a

257

Pooled SE

 

0.79

1.82

4.31

3.83

P-value

Fe source

0.0058

0.0532

0.0098

0.3819

Added Fe level

0.2659

0.0782

0.0348

0.2117

Fe Source × added Fe level

0.2505

0.5518

0.8321

0.9325

Linear effect4

0.0634

–

< 0.0001

–

  1. 1Data represent the means of 7 replicate cages (n = 7)
  2. 2Data represent the means of 21 replicate cages (n = 21)
  3. 3Data represent the means of 28 replicate cages (n = 28)
  4. 4Linear effects of added Fe levels
  5. A–CMeans with different superscripts between Fe sources differ (P < 0.05)
  6. a,bMeans with different superscripts between added Fe levels differ (P < 0.05)
  7. *Different (P < 0.05) from all Fe supplemental groups