Dominant microbiota | Reference | No. of genera | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria (> 90%) Peptostreptococcus, Propionibacterium, Eubacterium, Bacteroides, and Clostridium | Wei et al. [25] | 13 phyla and 117 genera | > 900 species-equivalent OTUs, defined at 0.03 phylogenetic distance |
Blautia, Faecalibacterium, and Anaerotruncus (dominant in the reused litter) Escherichia/Shigella, Lactobacillus, Bacteroides, and Subdoligranulum (dominant in the fresh litter) | Wang et al. [98] | 133 OTUs within 41 genera considered | Genera differed between the fresh and reused litter for the cecal digesta samples. More abundance in d 10 than d 35 |
10% previously known species, 35% previously known genus but unknown species, and 55% unknown genus | Apajalahti et al. [12] | > 640 species from 140 genera | Consider bacterial community rather than talking about individual species. |
Clostridiaceaen (65%), Fusobacterium (14%), Lactobacillus (8%) and Bacteroides (5%) | Albazaz and Bal [26] | Â | Â |
Clostridium leptum (20%), Clostridium coccoides (27%), Sporomusa sp. (21%), and Gamma Proteobacteria groups (20%), Atopobium (3.6%), Bacteroides (2%), and Bifidobacteria (1%) | Zhu et al. [2] | Â | Microbiota from ceca of mature birds fed standard commercial diet |
Lachnospiraceae (47%), Ruminococcaceae (19%), Bifidobacterium (10%), Lactobacillus (10%), Coriobacteriaceae (7%), Bacteroides (2%) and others (5%) | Apajalahti and Vienola [43] | Â | Average cecal microbiota composition of commercial broiler chicken farms |
Bacteroidetes (> 18%), Tenericutes and Proteobacteria (1%–5%) and at family level Ruminococcaceae, Bacteroidaceae, uncultured Clostridiales, and Streptococcaceae | Witzig et al. [99] |  | Microbiota present in ceca |
Fusobacterium prausnitzii, Ruminococci, Clostridia and E. cecorum | Gong et al. [20] | Â | Present in cecal mucosa |